Concerning ClimateGate – Another Smoking Gun!

Concerning ClimateGate – another smoking gun!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mxmo9DskYE&feature=player_embedded

Listen, I’m a middle-of-the-roader on this climate change/global warming thing. Have never been a denier.

The climate is changing (always has, always will). Greenhouse gases (of which H2O is the largest contributor [that’s right – water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas]) seem to be increasing. Human activity is a contributor (but – by far – one of the lesser players), we should keep our climate/world/environment clean (but not because “the Earth has a fever” [what if G. W. Bush, instead of Algore had said that?!?] – because it’s good for us human beings).

This puny race of homo sapiens will barely scratch the temperature reduction surface (Do we even want to fuck around w/ the weather – I’m not so sure. The law of unintended consequences is never – NEVER! – suspended). Oh yeah, and do we really want to redistribute our wealth to “poorer, less fortunate” so they can piss it away (their incompetence is the major reason they’re poorer and less fortunate)?

And now, of course – it appears the religion of environmentalism – yes, I said Religion of Environmentalism – you know, the religion that thinks human beings (except left-wingers) are a scourge; the Religion that fire-bombs car dealerships. You know, the real violent types vs. the alleged violent types (i.e. Janet Napolitano ID’d right-winger, tea-baggers, etc) – they want us to go back to pre-1840 levels.

Yeah, that’s a good idea. When child mortality for those under 5 was 50%, when women were lucky to get to 30 years old (after having those 9 children), when a scratch could cause infection (thus death). Yeah, when we didn’t have the time for tv and the internet and trips to go see nature because the remaining poor souls left alive were wearing themselves out to an early grave at age 40 (woo hoo! it’s my 49th birthday in a few days – I would’ve been dead most probably back then) because the life of manual labor. Yeah, the good ol’ days! Let’s go back to those times when pussy-left-wingers would’ve not made it out of their teens (oops – that sounded kinda angry didn’t it? Wonder if Napolitano will ID me as someone w/ violent tendencies – you know, like right-wing soldiers coming back from Iraq/Afghanistan?). Damn right I’m angry – at those whores (Alan Grayson’s term) we call the media who refuse to give us the unvarnished truth.

Whew!

So anyway, click the link below for another log to put on the Global Warming Alarmist Fire (btw – don’t fire’s contribute to global-warming, greenhouse gases?):

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100019301/climategate-another-smoking-gun/

Thank you “always right” James Delingpole!

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

2 Comments on “Concerning ClimateGate – Another Smoking Gun!”

  1. hkyson Says:

    “Climategate” started out when there appeared on the Internet a collection of e-mails of a group of climatologists who work in the University of East Anglia in England. These documents reveal that some climatologists of international preeminence have manipulated the data of their investigations and have strongly tried to discredit climatologists who are not convinced that the increasing quantities of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere are the cause of global warming.

    It is true that a majority of the scientists who study climatic tendencies in our atmosphere have arrived at the conclusion that the world’s climate is changing, and they have convinced a group of politicians, some of whom are politically powerful, of the truth of their conclusions.

    A minority, however, is skeptical. Some believe that recent data that suggest that the average temperature of the atmosphere is going up can be explained by natural variations in solar radiation and that global warming is a temporary phenomenon. Others believe that the historical evidence indicating that the temperature of the atmosphere is going up at a dangerous rate is simply not reliable.

    Such lacks of agreement are common in the sciences. They are reduced and eventually eliminated with the accumulation of new evidence and of more refined theories or even by completely new ones. Such debates can persist for a period of decades. Academics often throw invective at one another in these debates. But typically this does not mean much.

    But the case of climate change is different. If the evidence indicates that global warming is progressive, is caused principally by our industrial processes, and will probably cause disastrous changes in our atmosphere before the end of the twenty-first century, then we do not have the time to verify precisely if this evidence is reliable. Such a process would be a question of many years of new investigations. And if the alarmist climatologists are right, such a delay would be tragic for all humanity.

    The difficulty is that economic and climatologic systems are very complicated. They are not like celestial mechanics, which involves only the interaction of gravity and centrifugal force, and efforts to construct computerized models to describe these complicated systems simply cannot include all the factors that are influential in the evolution of these complicated systems.

    All this does not necessarily indicate that the alarmist climatologists are not right. But it really means that if global warming is occurring, we cannot know exactly what will be the average temperature of our atmosphere in the year 2100 and what will be the average sea level of the world’s ocean in that year.

    It also means that we cannot be confident that efforts by the industrialized countries to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere will have a significant influence on the evolution of the world’s climate.

    Alas, the reduction of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere would be very costly and would greatly change the lives of all the inhabitants of our planet–with the possibility (perhaps even the probability!) that all these efforts will be completely useless.

    Harleigh Kyson Jr.

  2. mikewsmith Says:

    Very well said Mr. Kyson


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: